In school, we have learned about acute angle triangles, right angle triangles, and obtuse angle triangles. Then in the 11th & 12th, we have learned about the focal length of mirrors, which is very important to arrive at the size of image formation. And later I have played with different CC TV cameras of different focal lengths and different types of lenses. Please bear with me for going a little technical. The angle, focal length, lens type, lens technology, lens size, light condition, shutter speed, etc are all important areas of image formation, quality, and size of the image. These are all about image formation.
Kejriwal came into politics forming a kind of image and now the BJP is trying to form a different kind of image. Not necessarily the image of Kejriwal we saw earlier was the correct one, nor was what the BJP is trying to project true or the reality. The reality could be starkly different. Because the image formation does not entirely depend on the look of the object. It depends on a lot of other factors like - the angle, focal length, lens type (CCD or CMOS), lens technology, lens size, light condition, ALC ( auto light compensation), BLC (backlight compensation), shutter speed, Auto Exposure Shutter (AES), Auto Gain Control (AGC), noise reduction, FPS, the skill of the makeup artists, costume designer, hair stylist, the skill of the cameraman, Visual effects (sometimes abbreviated VFX), sound theatrics, storyline, dialogue, cinematography, direction, etc. It doesn’t end there. A lot depends on the projection technology, the screen type, size and resolution, etc. And then we get the final output. I have professionally worked on the subject. I know it all depends on what I want to capture and what I want to project. What you see need not be the truth, it could just be the opposite of the truth an illusion.
The kind of images we get to see of Modi Ji, Rahul Gandhi, and Kejriwal are all professionally made-up images. A tremendous amount of money and effort has been made to project a positive image of Modi Ji and a negative image of Rahul Gandhi. Plus Rahul Gandhi has been debarred from getting any media limelight or spotlight. I understand a common man can't decipher how much is reality and how much is makeup and skillset of the entire crew involved in image makeover. These days Media trials are mostly one-sided paid projections to throw designed narratives. They are done very beautifully and convincingly where Bahuabli can do anything and we believe it. Audiences across the world are captivated to see the Bahubali in theater. We desperately try to believe the illusions because they look beautiful. The hero looks astounding and the villain looks audacious.
Coming back to your question - Why was the third petition to remove Kejriwal from the CM post of the Supreme Court also rejected? A part of the judiciary refused to give Kejriwal any protection against arrest. A part of the judiciary decided that Kejriwal should be behind the bars despite ED not asking for his further custody. Kejriwal’s arrest has been found as legally correct by the honorable HC. And now the honourable SC finds it absolutely legal for Kejriwal to run the government from prison and rejected all the petitions to remove Kejriwal from the CM post. It's like the same Pravash looks different in different movies. None of them are wrong. It entirely depends on how he is projected.
I feel that possibly the SC believes that its intervention or injunction is not required in the matter. The case against Kejriwal is fought by the government of India. And the government of India is sufficiently empowered to remove Kejriwal from his chair if they deem fit. Judicial intervention is not required since the government is well within its power to remove Kejriwal. So it's the Modi government who has to take the action. However, the judiciary may intervene if the government of India exercises its power and removes Kejriwal from the CM’s post. The SC may accept petitions challenging the executive order removing Kejriwal from the chair. because that is the job of the judiciary.
No comments:
Post a Comment